If so, you are not alone.

To properly understand what one is up against, one must know the opposition. Most courts are run by arbitrary policy, not law. When an individual researches the law itself, and does not rely upon the courts or lawyers to instruct them on the law, that individual's chance of exiting victorious are greatly increased.

Unfortunately, the courts, in their aristocratic mind set, often choose not to follow their own law. However, if an individual is knowledgeable of the law, they can then place the court in the uncomfortable position of having to blatantly disregard the law to convict. The court wishes to avoid this, as it destroys the illusion of their legitimacy.

These motions and strategies are all based off of my personal study of Indiana law. While all of statements are based entirely off of Indiana law, not one single lawyer in the state would dare submit or argue some of the points of this research, as they could lose their livelihood. Lawyers are licensed, and are officers of the court. If a lawyer attempts to actually get to the root of the law, or challenge the court directly, they will face repercussions.

But as an individual, without a license or a working-relationship with the court, has freedom to defend oneself with any and all legal means. This includes many due process steps that are always ignored. If an individual does not insist on each step being followed, the courts will skip over these steps in their zeal to collect the individuals hard-earned money with as little effort as possible. The average traffic infraction in Indiana allows the state to collect it's fines with only 3 minutes of work. This is how the state's courts collected approximately 200 million dollars in revenue last year.

While in court, many officials wonder why one would go through "all of this trouble" to defend oneself. They say "Why don't you just pay the fine?" If one does not understand freedom, then I don't know if it can be explained to them. If people make the amount of effort needed to collect this money increase, then maybe the state will not be so fervent in trying to take it. If everyone in the state who received a traffic ticket simply went to the court and plead not guilty, the court could not handle the caseload. They would be forced to make changes.

This site was created to serve as a knowledge base for individuals who wish to stand up for their rights, but don't know where to start.

This site contains links to information needed to better defend oneself against the onslaught of bureaucrats, politicians, and the various governmental layers of red tape.

Included are downloadable template court motions and filings in Adobe PDF format.

Using this knowledge, the individual may then have a recourse to compete with the judge, prosecutor, and officers who are in court on a day-to-day basis. Their home-court advantage can be overcome.